Posted by: willlyons | August 6, 2012

Real Science

Every few years, a chunk of ice calves off the Petermann glacier in Greenland and floats away. That is what glaciers do, when they reach the sea.  The image below is from 2010

The glacier then advances and another chunk breaks off – like this summer.

Each time this completely normal and natural cyclical event happens, the press and a few scientists get hysterical and tell us that something unusual is happening. Because they are complete idiots.

View original post

Posted by: willlyons | August 5, 2012

Real Science

According to Tom Karl, Americans are very stupid people who have severe trouble taking temperature readings – except during the year 1988.  Americans are currently in an exponentially increasing stupid state, where temperatures need to be adjusted upwards by more and more every year.

In other words, USHCN is desperately trying to hide the decline.

View original post

Posted by: willlyons | August 5, 2012

Real Science

You can’t make this stuff up. He claims that the weather is the most extreme in 10,000 years based on a baseline of “the last few decades

What a brazen liar this man is. He wrote the exact opposite ten years ago.

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath.

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

There were twice as many daily all-time high temperature records set or tied during the 1930s as in the 2000s, for USHCN stations which were operational during both decades…

View original post 21 more words

Posted by: willlyons | August 5, 2012

Real Science

The research by a man often called the “godfather of global warming” says that the likelihood of such temperatures occurring from the 1950s through the 1980s was rarer than 1 in 300. Now, the odds are closer to 1 in 10, according to the study by NASA scientist James Hansen. He says that statistically what’s happening is not random or normal, but pure and simple climate change.

The Associated Press: New study links current events to climate change

No, it is pure and simple cherry-picking. Had he compared against the 1930s he would have seen that recent temperatures have been relatively quite cool.

Data is for all USHCN stations which were operational during both the 1930s and the most recent decade.

View original post

Posted by: willlyons | July 31, 2012

Oh how they jum…

Oh how they jumped for glee when Muller a well-known skeptic took money from the Koch brothers to do research on Global warming. Oh, how they hugged each other with anticipation when the skeptic came back and gleefully told the media that he had found that it was humankind that had coursed climate change. Oh how they embraced him when he threw his hands up and told everyone that he was a converted skeptic, how they slapped him on his back and welcomed him in to their den of deceit.


Muller a skeptic don’t make me laugh he was never a skeptic but a sheep in wolf clothing who did not even do the job correctly that he was tasked to do for his brothers in crime. The dishonest people who peddle the lies forget one vital element when they peddle the lies, they forget with today’s World Wide Web anyone can find a lie and disprove what they are saying like I am about to do now.


In 2003, Muller the well-known skeptic (their words not mine) wrote these words when talking about medieval warming period! “Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.”


Does that sound like your average skeptic? Or what about this remark he made in 2008!


Muller: Global warming. There is a consensus that global warming is real. There has not been much so far, but it’s going to get much, much worse. The thing I would tell the president is that the global warming, according to the global consensus — that’s the IPCC scientists, who won the Nobel Prize — the global warming of the future is going to come from the developing world. The exploding economies of China and India and Asia are going to be responsible for the CO2.



Perhaps that sounds like your average skeptic.


How about this remark again in 2008!

Do you consider yourself an environmentalist?

Oh, yes. [Laughs.] In fact, back in the early ’80s, I resigned from the Sierra Club over the issue of global warming. At that time, they were opposing nuclear power. What I wrote them in my letter of resignation was that, if you oppose nuclear power, the U.S. will become much more heavily dependent on fossil fuels, and that this is a pollutant to the atmosphere that is very likely to lead to global warming.


And taken from the same interview!


My house is lit by compact fluorescent light bulbs. Let me just tell you, though: Suppose I drove an SUV and lit my house with the worst kind of light — I could still be an environmentalist. Al Gore flies around in a jet plane — absolutely fine with me. The important thing is not getting Al Gore out of his jet plane; the important thing is solving the world’s problem. What we really need are policies around the world that address the problem, not feel-good measures. If [Al Gore] reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion — which he does, but he’s very effective at it — then let him fly any plane he wants.


Don’t be fooled like the fools who are telling everyone that Muller was a Sceptic the truth of the matter as I have just shown is that from the 80s Muller believed that CO2 was going to course Global warming. The lies that they are now telling once more show how desperate these people are.


And one more thing that is quite interesting. All this came out just before it was revealed that research has shown that the urban heat in the U.S.A has been grossly exaggerated over the last thirty years. Moreover, if the result of that research is confirmed then it has far-reaching implications on other urban heat.


The result of the new study is shocking: Instead of correcting downwards, temperatures that were heated by the urban heat island effect, the official US administration offices apparently corrected data from qualitively reliable stations upwards, which appears to be unjustifiable. If the result were confirmed, then it would be a shocking development. The warming in the USA over the last years would be far less rapid than what has always been assumed. And because similar errors are suspected elsewhere, the issue could quickly gain global relevance.”



Isn’t it funny that as soon as something comes out that might prove that these climate scientists who have been using data from urban heat have got it wrong the usual malcontents try to muddy the water with something that is not actually very important namely that a physic is not now a skeptic but now believes that it is mankind and CO2 is the course even though he has never been a skeptic even though he seems to think that he was a skeptic. Confused? You shouldn’t be this is what Warmegedisnests do, they muddy the water and write utter tripe.


This is how you should treat the malcontent warmegedisnests who reside amongst us, treat them with the contempt that they deserve.

Posted by: willlyons | July 31, 2012

Hitler Reacts To Herr Muller’s Failure

Hitler Reacts To Herr Muller’s Failure.

Meltblizzard Ends In Greenland – Golf Tee Times Restored.

Posted by: willlyons | July 29, 2012

The truth about Polar Bears

We see many falsehoods and myths when we talk about Polar Bears that we see in the arctic, and many of the falsehoods and myths are perpetuated by the ignorant and downright liars called warmegedisnests and doomotoligests to somehow try to explain their dogma on global warming and to try to scare the population into thinking about something that they have never showed any proof of.


After all what better way to tug at most people heart strings than to advertise the fact even though it’s not true that these magnificent white beasts are fast becoming extinct and if we don’t stop using oil and fossil fuels the arctic seas that ice over and sustain these beasts will be gone. And then were will these beasts get there food from.


Did you notice two key words in the last paragraph? Oil and fossil because it is those two words that are feeding these lies and ignorance. And there were you thinking it was all about climate change or global warming well I am sorry to burst people bubbles but climate change or even global warming are the last thing on these activists minds it a convenient tool to beat the drum about how they would like the demise of oil.


So when you next see and comment on an article about Polar Bears and someone is banging on about these poor beasts becoming extinct remember these words I am about to write.


First, the population of polar bears, all Polar Bears live in and around the Arctic in the countries of America, Canada, Russia, Denmark, and Norway, Greenland of course belongs to Denmark all country’s except Canada have a no hunting ban on these bears and at the moment its estimated that between 25,000 and 40,000 exist


The Polar Bear finds its main food when the ice in the arctic freezes over and that food is ringed and bearded seals. They will they also eat harp and hooded seals and they are great at scavenging and will never turn their nose up at a free meal of carcasses of beluga whales, walruses, narwhals, and bowhead whales that die naturally and wash up on the shores of countries where they are hunting.


They will also not turn their noses up at young walruses and will often try to kill beluga whales when they come up for air in the many spots in the ice where there are holes.


The Polar Bear is a great swimmer it will swim for miles to get to its prey and it can swim at 6 mph while when it walks it only walks at 3.5 mph they also rest on ice floes when out in open water.

We are often told that it’s not natural for a Polar bear to swim mile after mile nothing could be further from the truth, the Polar Bear has always swam mile after mile to get to its prey and it will carry its young on its back while doing so.



Many wildlife programs show Polar Bears sitting and waiting for the ice to form and while it is true that the ice has been forming later than usual in the last few years due to nothing more than a natural cycle that has happened 500 hundred years or more, records can show from the Logs of shipping in that area that it has been free from ice on many occasions it does not mean that the Polar Bear is starving as it will eat just like its cousins the Brown and Grizzly Bear just about anything and it will eat any animal they can get, including reindeer, small rodents, seabirds, waterfowl, fish, eggs, vegetation (including kelp), berries.


A polar bear’s stomach can hold an estimated 15% to 20% of its body weight. A polar bear generally eats this much only when its energy demands are high. A bear can assimilate 84% of the protein and 97% of the fat it eats. Polar bears need an average of 2 kg (4.4 lb.) of fat per day to obtain enough energy to survive. A ringed seal weighing 55 kg (121 lb.) can provide up to eight days of energy for a polar bear.


One more fact that is not generally known is that the Polar Bear often does not eat all of its prey. Does that sound like an animal that is in decline?


Another fact is that hunting and not climate change has been the greatest known cause of polar bear mortality. In Canada 500 to 600, Polar bears a year are hunted and killed. Licenses are given to the Inuit who then sell those licenses to mostly American hunters; a stipulation is that the hunter is guided by an Inuit and only one bear per hunter is killed. Money is the main motive with $25,000-$30,000 changing hands.


Considering all things, what the warmegedisnests are telling everyone does not hold water. We are told by them that its climate change that is making the Polar Bear extinct, nothing could be further from the truth far from becoming an extinct species they are thriving.


That is not to say that we should be complacent in the 1950 there was no ban on hunting and it was in this period that we actually saw the demise of the Polar Bear, Hunters began to hunt them in earnest using snowmobiles, aircraft, and boats and an international agreement saw countries banning the hunting of Polar Bears in 1973.


Since then despite what the Warmageddonist tell you the population is slowly growing and will continue to grow as long as man does not kill them by hunting them to the point extinction like they did to the Bison and to the point like they did in the 50s and 60s


In the 50s as little as 5,000 Polar Bears existed, between 1965 to 1970 they had grown to 8,000, to 10,000. In 1985 when global warming was supposedly at its worst they had grown to 25,000 and since 2005 we now see a population of between 25,000 to 40,000. Does it sound to you that climate change like these activists are saying is the demise of the Polar Bear?



Remember that when a Warmageddonist speaks or writes they bend the truth to suit whatever motive they have, they lie through their back teeth and then accuse the ones that tell the truth of lying. They are activists who would see your way of life demise quite fast if given half a chance. And by doing that they deny the true science that never stands still. They are the true deniers in our society.


Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012

The Theory Is Very Simple

Sometimes the simplest of answers to a puzzle are best. For years, we have been told without any actual proof I might add that it was CO2 that was driving our planets warming phase. Even today, when we can see that our planet has not warmed very much since 1998 certain people will come out of the woodwork and insist that it is all to do with CO2; apparently, so I am informed CO2 reached a huge 31.6 gigatonnes, that 31.6 gigatonnes apparently is a record high.


Imagine that, 31.6 gigatonnes of CO2 going into our atmosphere and there is no additional warming, it must be driving the warmegedisnests and doomotoligests absolutely nuts to see all this CO2 going into our atmosphere and not being able to say why the planet has not warmed since 1998 to what they expected it to do.


Well as I said at the beginning sometimes the simplest of answers are best, and a scientist at the Duke University and at the Active Cavity Radiometer Solar Irradiance Monitor Lab, which is associated with the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, has come up with a theory and it is this.


He claims, “at least 60% of the warming of the Earth observed since 1970 appears to be induced by natural cycles which are present in the solar system.” As his theory is controversial, we asked him to outline it. For the near future, he predicts a stabilisation of global temperature or cooling until 2030-2040.


I suggest people read what his theory is, it is as he says revolutionary. And of course, the mainstream climate community will close their ears to what he has to say because as he mentions they have religiously assumed that the science is settled, if anyone is in doubt about that little fact just listen and read what the Gather warmegedisnests and Doomotoligests spout. However, I do not listen to what they have to say anymore, as the climate is the last thing on their mind it is just a useful tool for their hatred of the oil industry.

As Donna Lamframboise writes in the climate science world anyone, who dares to publish politically incorrect content will be boycotted and accused of dishonesty by a ruling clique of scientists.


Donna Lamframboise: No Reasonable Person Should Trust Climate Scientists.


And how very true that is we see it all the time, everything that we on this side of the coin write is dishonest when we publish our articles or comment on climate change. It is getting so boring now when we see a happening it is the same thing over and over again with them, it is dishonest, they pander to the Lobbyists, its unscientific, they intentionally misrepresent the science, they cherry pick, but these people who say this never actually say anything of importance so it’s all very irrelevant.

Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012

Desperate Clima…

Desperate Climate Scientists Blame Bad Weather On Global Warming.

How desperate can one get? Well very desperate indeed when you’re Climate Scientists or a climate activist and the weather does not play ball with your research.


After decades of debunking and statements by responsible scientists, that climate is not weather and individual anomalies are not an indication of climate change, the government funded IPCC lackeys at the UK’s Met Office and America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have publicly attributed recent bad weather events to man-made climate change. These irresponsible boffins’ shrill claims illustrate the desperation in the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) camp in the face of declining public concern over climate change. While admitting that it is impossible to blame a single event on global warming, climate alarmists are claiming attribution is possible as long as it is framed in terms of probability. They have gone from lies, to damn lies and now, finally, to statistics.


Moreover, some activist are even wanting and hoping for more extreme weather discomfort that will make crops fail along with power cuts in the hope that it changes the minds of people, to these people it’s all worth it in the end. It hasn’t crossed their minds that what we are seeing at the moment is what has happened throughout the ages, Oh no all they can see is that all that they have fought for over the years is all falling apart and that public opinion for what they stand for has been dropping dramatically. So they resort and want a more drastic approach. And how disgusting is that.

Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012


Welcome to! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!

View original post

Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012

If it is hot – …

If it is hot – that’s dangerous global warming.


If it’s cold – that just weather.


When there was deep snow over all the UK, record cold in Europe and Russia, and blizzards in the USA last winter, we were told, “That’s not climate, that’s weather!”


Now after a 15 year period of flat or declining global temperatures, when we get a hot spell we are told, “That’s not weather, that’s climate!”.


I’m not buying it, guys.


As for the heatwave and fires in Colorado, that is just bad weather and poor forest management. The wildfires are helped by a policy of not back-burning the forests to reduce fuel loadings, and by the idiocy of building housing among the trees without fire breaks between the two.


Don’t try to lay the blame for this on harmless, beneficial to plants, non-pollutant carbon dioxide.


If Rio didn’t give you the message then you are blind – Rio was the funeral rite for the busted hypothesis that was called anthropogenic global warming. Your theory is flawed, your cause is lost, and your god is dead: global warming is now a religion, not science. The IPCC computer models are known to have zero predictive power: nothing they predicted has come to pass. Temperatures are not rising, nor are the seas.


Your prophet Al Gore has led you to a desert of failed ideologies. You may fool the politicians for a few more budgets, but the common people are on to you.


My advice: Jump from this bandwagon before it plummets off the cliff!


Allen Horrell


Oh and by the way, this is what the non-existent Ice looks like in summer in THE Arctic



We have been told constantly that the Arctic WOULD SOON BE ICE FREE.


NASA climate scientist Jay Zwally said: “At this rate, the Arctic Ocean could be nearly ice-free at the end of summer by 2012, much faster than previous predictions.”




Because climate change in the Arctic region is occurring faster and to a greater extent than anywhere else, the Arctic Ocean may be ice-free for a short period of time as early as the summer of 2015, according to the 2009 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report completed by the eight Arctic Council Nations.



December 15, 2009


There are many kinds of truth. Al Gore was poleaxed by an inconvenient one yesterday.


The former US Vice-President, who became an unlikely figurehead for the green movement after narrating the Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth, became entangled in a new climate change “spin” row.


Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.


In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”





There are credible scientists who are now predicting an ice-free (summer) arctic by as early as 2013. The implications are mind boggling. The impact on wildlife, humans and the rest of the world’s weather patterns is impossible to predict for specific areas and to exact detail.



Well if no has noticed, we are well into 2012 and 2013-2015 is but just a short time away. It all goes to show how incredibly clueless Our Global Warming Friends Are


This is what all that non-existent Ice doesn’t look like in summer 2012 July 15



Only A Completely Daft Person or Dishonest person Would Forecast And Ice Free Arctic and try to get away with it.


Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012

Dishonest climate persons

Its folly to rely on a few hot weeks in an area to say it proves global warming, yet this is what has happened by quite a few warmegedisnests and doomotoligests. June saw a heat wave pass over an area of America and the media and the few warmegedisnests and doomotoligests could not wait to write about how global warming is happening.


We have seen it all before though haven’t we the warmth as well as the hand wringing malcontents who without a second thought use heat waves as a weapon to bring home to everyone that fossil fuel is bad for everyone.


They were blind to the fact that on the 27th June 2012, 116 City’s from Montana to Florida measured record low temperatures. Not one of these malcontents bothered to shout that little fact form the rooftops, Oh no they couldn’t do that could they after all to shout from the roof tops that 116 Cities in America had record breaking low temperature’s would not sit well with their warped activist agenda!!! No all we heard from this bunch of green activists was that we are all doomed.


Anyone remember that account of tarmac melting at Reagan National Airport posted by Pinocchio Gore? A passenger photographed the aircraft with a camera phone with its wheels stuck in the tarmac in 100-degree heat and Mr Pinocchio decided to use it in his blog to tell all his followers that it was proof that global warming was real. Really Mr Pinocchio what was your excuse in not using the data that said that Orlando International Airport, for example, saw an overnight low of 64 degrees, shattering the previous record of 66 set in 1920 why didn’t you use that little bit of information in your blog?????


It is easy to forget that at 3.8 million square miles, the United States comprises less than 2 percent of the Earth’s surface. Sizzling thermometer readings here do not indicate temperature patterns elsewhere especially in summer.


Why didn’t Mr Pinocchio tell all and sundry in his blog that Sweden saw its chilliest June since weather statistics were first recorded in 1786, with an average daytime high of 56 degrees — three degrees below normal, why didn’t you blog that little fact Gore?


Why didn’t he blog that my own country the United Kingdom is seeing the coolest summer since records began, why didn’t that fact find its way into his blog, oh that’s right if it did find its way into his blog it would show people what utter buffoons and charlatans his devout followers are. Beware of warmegedisnests and doomotoligests who point to localized summer heat as proof of climate change across the entire world: They are only making hay while the sun shines.


Only A Completely Daft Person or Dishonest person would try to assume that a few heat waves was proof of either climate change or global warming and try to get away with it.

Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012

The lies that are told by Warmegedinists

If anyone wants to see first-hand how dishonest warmegedisnests are when reporting climate change then they have to look no further than the latest NASA report that shows Greenland ice melting.


In mid-July, NASA saw what they called unprecedented melting of the Greenland ice and showed to the world showed two pictures, both were red with the first image showing a white patch over the centre of the picture. The second image showed no white over the centre. Both images were of Greenland.


At a glance persons would be worried about this rapid Ice loss especially people who believe in manmade global warming they would see images that showed Greenland with Ice and one with Greenland without ice. In addition, I believe that this was done on purpose, if it was not done on purpose why they not showed the actual satellite photos that show nothing like a rabid ice loss.


All of this smacks of desperation by people who should know better, even the colour coding of the two images are to spread fear amongst people. In addition, of course there will be people that will believe all of this nonsense and that above anything else is why it has been shown this way.


The actual photos show a different story though.


Notice also the web cam photo taken on July 9, at -19C right at the time of the NASA great Greenland melt.


Of course, again when we delve a little deeper we also see that unprecedented ice loss is nothing of the sort as it accrues every 150 years. Lora Koenig, another Goddard glaciologist, told NASA similar rapid melting occurs about every 150 years

What kind of morons would interpret a cyclical event of 150 years, which is right on schedule – as being due to climate change? Answer people who are undoubtedly dishonest


I love today’s technology without it I would not be able to refute so much B/S comes out of the mouths of Warmegedisnests and Doomotoligests who harp on about melting ice in summer as if it’s never been known to do that.

Posted by: willlyons | July 28, 2012

Hello world!

Welcome to! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!